The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu has ignited widespread debate. While some perceive it as a necessary step toward restoring peace and order, others criticize it as an overreach of executive power that could worsen existing tensions. The suspension of elected officials, including the governor and lawmakers, has only deepened the controversy, raising questions about its constitutional validity and long-term implications for democracy.
Rivers State, a vital economic hub in Nigeria, has been embroiled in a prolonged political crisis, largely fueled by power struggles among political elites. The conflict between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, now FCT Minister Nyesom Wike, has destabilized governance, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty and tension. Reports of violent clashes, threats, and political maneuvering have made governance nearly impossible, prompting federal intervention.
While some believe that the state of emergency is a strategic move to protect lives and property, others view it as a calculated political maneuver that favors one faction over the other. This divide is evident in public reactions—some commend the federal government for acting before the situation spirals out of control, while others condemn it as an attempt to sideline elected officials.
The 1999 Nigerian Constitution, under Section 305, grants the President the authority to declare a state of emergency in specific situations, including when there is a breakdown of public order or a threat to national security. However, legal experts argue that while the President can assume greater powers under such circumstances, the suspension of a sitting governor and elected lawmakers remains contentious. Critics argue that the Constitution does not explicitly provide for the removal of elected state officials during an emergency, raising concerns about a dangerous precedent that could weaken Nigeria’s democratic institutions.
Nigeria has a history of emergency rule in certain states, including Plateau (2004), Ekiti (2006), and Adamawa, Borno, and Yobe (2013) under President Goodluck Jonathan. While these interventions aimed to restore order, they were met with mixed reactions. Some resulted in relative peace, while others left deep scars, fueling further grievances.
The Rivers scenario is particularly sensitive because the crisis is primarily political rather than security-driven. Unlike previous emergency declarations linked to insurgencies or large-scale violence, this intervention raises concerns about political interference and federal overreach.
Beyond the legal and political debates, the state of emergency should serve as a moment of deep reflection for all warring parties. Rivers people, who have suffered the consequences of political instability, deserve peace, good governance, and development—not endless power struggles.
This period should not be used as an opportunity for political score-settling but as a chance for leaders to reconsider their actions and prioritize the well-being of the people. Political actors, traditional rulers, and civil society groups must engage in sincere dialogue to restore trust and chart a path toward reconciliation.
The Rivers crisis has already taken a toll on businesses, social life, and governance. If left unchecked, it could escalate into a larger crisis with long-term consequences. All stakeholders must use this period to heal divisions and work towards a lasting solution. Governance should not be sacrificed on the altar of political ambition.
While the state of emergency may provide temporary relief, it is not a sustainable solution. Political stability and peace in Rivers State can only be achieved through genuine dialogue, adherence to democratic principles, and a collective commitment to prioritizing the people’s interests over personal ambitions.
The innocent citizens of Rivers State deserve leaders who are more concerned about their welfare than political supremacy. It is time for all parties to step back, reflect, and seek common ground for the greater good. Let this period be one of healing, not further chaos.
About Author
